Superman stumbled at the international box office in its first weekend despite pulling strong domestic numbers.
In the high-stakes world of superhero cinema, where global dominance often determines a franchise’s fate, James Gunn’s Superman has soared domestically but stumbled overseas. While the film’s $122 million North American opening weekend marks a triumphant reboot for DC Studios—though still falling short of Man of Steel’s $128.7 million—the international haul tells a far less heroic story.
Superman fighting The Hammer of Boravia in the trailer for James Gunn’s Superman – YouTube, DC
Clocking in at just $95 million from 78 markets, this overseas performance falls short of pre-release projections and underscores a persistent Achilles’ heel for DC: its struggle to captivate audiences beyond U.S. borders.
Heading into the July 11-13 weekend, industry trackers like Deadline and Variety pegged Superman’s global debut at $200 million or more, with international markets expected to contribute at least $100 million—potentially matching or exceeding the domestic take for a balanced 1:1 ratio.
This optimism stemmed from early rollouts in key territories like France, Italy, and Korea starting mid-week, giving the film extra “runway” to build momentum. Yet, the final tally reveals a stark imbalance. Domestic earnings outperformed the combined might of those 78 international markets, resulting in a 56% domestic split.
Superman beaten down in the trailer for James Gunn’s Superman – YouTube, DC
For context, blockbuster franchises like Marvel’s typically rely on overseas for 60-70% of their totals, turning films like Avengers: Endgame into billion-dollar behemoths. Here, Superman feels more like a homegrown hero than a worldwide icon.
Comparisons paint an even grimmer picture. The $95 million overseas bow dips below Shazam’s $102 million international opening, a lighter, family-friendly DC entry that benefited from lower expectations and a $100 million budget. It’s also perilously close to massive flop Captain America: Brave New World’s reported $92 million overseas start earlier this year.
This is all despite Superman boasting a more iconic character and a $225 million production tag (plus a hefty marketing campaign).
Henry Cavill as Superman in Man of Steel – HBO Max
Historically, Superman films have skewed domestic. Man of Steel was 57% U.S.-centric with an $86 million international debut. But Gunn’s reboot was supposed to transcend that, leveraging his Guardians of the Galaxy pedigree for broader appeal.
Market breakdowns reveal where the kryptonite hit hardest.
Strongholds like Mexico ($3.8 million through Friday), the UK ($3.6 million), and Brazil ($3 million) showed promise, with Superman outperforming Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom by 159% in Italy and setting records as Gunn’s biggest opener in Brazil. Australia and France each added $2.5 million, and the film claimed the best opening day of 2025 Down Under. But Asia, a crucial revenue driver for superheroes, faltered. China projected a meager $11 million amid local competition and post-lockdown market shifts, while Japan and other regions lagged.
President Xi Jinping of China issues a New Year’s Address – YouTube, South China Morning Post
This softness isn’t isolated. It highlights broader challenges like superhero fatigue, where audiences weary of caped crusaders prioritize local blockbusters or streaming alternatives.
Analysts have been diplomatic, calling it a “solid start” overall, with the $217 million global total that exceeds initial tracking and positions the film for $500-600 million worldwide if legs hold strong.
Yet, whispers of disappointment linger. The Hollywood Reporter noted the international turnout as “slightly softer-than-expected,” while Variety echoed that the overseas dip tempered the euphoria from Thursday’s record $22.5 million previews. For DC, this lopsided launch raises red flags.
Superman wounded in the snow in the trailer for James Gunn’s Superman – YouTube, DC
Warner Bros. desperately needs robust international performance to offset its ballooning budgets. Superman’s $225 million production cost—combined with a marketing campaign estimated at around $200 million, pushing total expenses well over $400 million—demands far more than the $500 million break-even figure floated by some trades.
In reality, factoring in theater splits (where studios retain only about 45-50% of gross) and other fees, the film likely requires $800 million or more worldwide to truly profit. This is a claim James Gunn has repeatedly refuted while offering no actual numbers to back up his statements. If overseas markets continue to underperform, it could severely hobble James Gunn and Peter Safran’s ambitious “Gods and Monsters” slate, leaving DC overly reliant on domestic audiences in a jam-packed 2025 lineup.
Dean Cain as Superman – YouTube, Dean Cain Gallery
Why the global chill? Political undercurrents may be at play, with some speculating that debates over the film’s tone—too light-hearted or perceived as “woke”—alienated conservative viewers in international markets, though such claims remain largely anecdotal. Genre fatigue is undeniable; even Jurassic World Rebirth suffered a steep drop this weekend, highlighting audiences’ growing weariness of spectacle-driven blockbusters.
Fierce competition from local hits in China and Europe further dampened turnout, compounded by the mid-summer release timing that left Superman squeezed between family-friendly animations like Lilo & Stitch ($146 million opener) and dino-themed revivals.
Superman withstands fire in the trailer for James Gunn’s Superman – YouTube, DC
Looking ahead, the second weekend will be telling. A sub-50% drop could propel Superman toward profitability, but persistent international weakness might cap its ceiling at $600 million. That would be respectable, but far from the billion-dollar benchmarks set by top Marvel films. For DC, this isn’t a total flop, but it’s a wake-up call. As Gunn’s universe unfolds, addressing this kryptonite will determine if DC rises like a phoenix or remains earthbound.
How do you feel about the international box office for Superman? Sound off in the comments and let us know!
UP NEXT: George Lucas to Make First On‑Stage Appearance at San Diego Comic‑Con
For all its faults, Man of Steel is the better movie. I wasn’t disappointed by Superman 2025, but there was nothing moving about it. Man of Steel had inspiring moments and a much more complex performance… and so much less monologuing.
I really missed some sort of intro and the flashbacks into challenges of Clark growing up strike me as being different than the typical origin story which have ONE defining moment (Uncle Ben’s death, Bruce Wayne’s parents being killed, being blasted by a cosmic storm).
Just having a little text on the screen doesn’t replace that.
Maybe Gunn should haven’t worried so much about changing the tagline from “… and the American way!” in hopes of softening the entry into international markets and being less offensive. As if the American way isn’t admired and other countries aren’t envious of the American way.
Apparently jimbo gunn’s Superman is only weakened by the green kryptonite. $
At least we now know Sups can get drunk if he goes to a red sun. The last part, with Gen Z Supergirl, was a pretty depressing setup for that movie.
So far things are not looking up for Gunn’s DC.
Gunn’s fan club needs to take note of this, since they’re tripping over themselves celebrating the movie’s domestic success, like that’s the only metric that matters.
Emasculated crybaby men. Girl bosses. Immigration propaganda.
This is supposed to be Superman, it’s pathetic. We want the American Dream, and I say this as a European. Instead we get a simp. It’s just stupid. STUPID.