The annual Met Gala is an annual fundraising event and a night for some of the biggest names in entertainment to show off often bizarre outfits. Each year has a theme, and this year’s was “Fashion is Art.” However, actress Sarah Paulson and her designer used the Met Gala as opportunity to exercise fashion as protest—specifically, the wealthy group they identify as 1%.
It’s a stance that has sparked backlash, given Paulson’s assumed personal wealth and the venue where she decided voice her opinions. The Met Gala’s reputation as an exclusive, high-cost event has long made it a flashpoint for debates about privilege, optics, and performative activism.
The Look and Its Intended Message
Sarah Paulson arrived at the Met Gala in a gray tulle gown from Matières Fécales, complete with a one-dollar bill covering her eyes—symbolism that was hardly subtle. “Fashion is Art and at its most daring, Political,” the designer wrote on Instagram. “[Paulson] is wearing the ‘Blinded by Money’ leather mask and the Destroyed Tulle Debutante Ballgown. The collection was a reflection of the greed and corruption that comes with extreme power.”
View this post on Instagram
Many commenters praised the intended message. However, others criticized it as a “hollow statement” and took issue with Paulson’s attendance at the Met Gala, writing that “there are real people suffering in ICE detention centers, while you party with ICE enabler Jeff Bezos.” This year’s event also drew scrutiny over billionaire couple Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez serving as co-chairs, as well as their perceived ties to President Trump following their attendance at his inauguration.
Other reactions pointed to the irony of Paulson’s protest gown. “Now this is really RICH,” one user wrote. “A rich celebrity making a “statement” about the 1% wealthy when she in fact is hobnobbing and rubbing elbows with them and actually being one of them. The irony.”
Media Criticism
Even fashion and culture magazine Cosmopolitan called out Paulson’s red carpet moment as “tone deaf,” adding that the look “is not the flex she thinks it is.”
Sarah Paulson – The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, YouTube
The outlet notes that tickets to the Met Gala reportedly cost around $75,000 and that fashion houses often cover the expense for celebrities like Sarah Paulson. While the magazine supports Paulson’s intent—objecting to what it describes as the top 1% holding a disproportionate share of global wealth—it suggests that “Paulson could’ve even stood outside the event while refusing to actually enter.”
What Cosmopolitan does not mention is that Paulson herself is reportedly worth around $12 million.
Earned Skepticism
Ultimately, the moment illustrates the pitfalls of celebrity advocacy. Sarah Paulson—or someone on her behalf—paid for her to attend the Met Gala, while the designer used the platform to make a social statement. In doing so, she drew criticism from multiple directions: some argue that her stance against the wealthy is hypocritical, while others contend that the message itself lacked depth or conviction.
Sarah Paulson – Harper’s BAZAAR, YouTube
READ: Former Nintendo President Alleges Amazon Made Illegal Demands
In the end, the controversy surrounding Paulson’s appearance reflects a broader skepticism toward celebrity-driven messaging—resulting in a moment that sparks conversation, but little substance.
What do you think about Sarah Paulson’s look at the Met Gala? Sound off in the comments and let us know!
UP NEXT: The Rock Claims the “Most Masculine Men” Wear Skirts While Wearing a Skirt
