As Predicted, Lawsuit Against Florida Over Disney Is Thrown Out

May 11, 2022  ·
  W. D. W. Pro

Reedy Creek Improvement District sign

Sometimes you’re proven right faster than you even expected…

On May 4th, we had to take a break from our near-continuous Star Wars coverage to address a bit of misinformation that was making its way through the mainstream press and Disney blogs. If you were a reader of those sites, you may have believed that a legitimate legal challenge was taking place against the State of Florida which would cause the Reedy Creek Improvement District that governs Walt Disney World to be saved. You may have also believed that a huge number of Osceola County residents, or even the government itself, was filing this most grave lawsuit. You might even still believe that taxes are going to explode for residents of Central Florida should Disney World lose some of its self-governance power.

And that’s why we ran an article to say, “none of that is true.” From “Misinformation Alert: No, Osceola Is NOT Suing Florida Over Disney“:

After a conversation with our TPP Legal Analyst, this is a complete waste of time. The lawsuit fails on three prongs of standing and is likely to be dismissed with prejudice using a 12b6 standard. SCOTUS has ruled there is very limited means by which to sue over taxes, which this lawsuit fails to meet. The claim is based on a hypothetical AND the claim depends on a first amendment violation proved against a third party… and that is not allowed for considerations of standing. Our legal analyst is so confident in this that we plan to post the 12b6 ruling once it is released, even if all the other sites out there have moved on once they’ve gotten all the readership they can from a flash in the pan headline.

 

The legal eagle couch attorneys were up in arms at us for a while. We received heated feedback on other sites. One message sent our way wanted us to doxx our legal analyst who happens to be a Florida lawyer. But guess what? After all those misinformed articles were published on other sites and after we caught flak for running our corrective piece… it turns out we were 100% correct. From Fox Business:

The new law “does not apply to them, they do not allege direct harm as a result of the challenged law, and they do not plausibly allege any credible threat of direct harm in the future,” the judge ruled.

The plaintiffs based their claim to standing on the supposition that the district’s elimination “might result in financial harm to Plaintiffs by virtue of a tax increase that has not yet been enacted,” Altonaga wrote. “That indirect and highly speculative alleged injury cannot support federal jurisdiction. … Again — it is worth emphasizing — the bill does not apply to Plaintiffs at all.”

 

In other words, what we thought would take six months to be dismissed with prejudice only took a few weeks. Guess what else? It was all a political stunt anyway.

 

Now, you can keep reading those other sites that give you false info or lead you to believe a narrative that isn’t true… or you can start adding That Park Place to your list of websites that help you know what’s really going on. We don’t carry water for either political party, we don’t pull favors for Disney or Universal or Dollywood or anyone else. We just try to relay the news as best we can in the most accurate fashion we know how. You might not always like what we’ll say, but you’ll know we’re trying to give it to you straight.

For all the news that should be fun, keep reading That Park Place! As always, drop a comment down below.

 

Author: W. D. W. Pro
Founder, Publisher, CEO WDW Pro is an opinionated commentator on all things Disney and Entertainment. He runs one of the most-viewed pop culture news channels on YouTube with many millions of views every month. First becoming well-known on WDWMagic.com, the author was brought on to work at Pirates and Princesses. Pro has previously released exclusive details on a variety of rumors and leaks before they were made public. Some exclusives have included breaking info on new Epcot attractions, detailing the light saber experience at the Star Wars hotel, reporting a Harrison Ford injury severity before anyone else, revealing Hugh Jackman was coming to the MCU, Storm would be linked with Wakanda and more. WDW Pro has written articles viewed by millions of readers while maintaining an 87% accuracy rating for revealing "insider" information in 2020. In 2021, the author had a better than 90% accuracy on reported leaks and rumors. Pro joined That Park Place on June 22nd, 2021. The author's accolades include being featured on The Daily Wire, cited by Timcast, numerous references by YouTube personalities, as well as having material tweeted by Dr. Jordan Peterson. WDW Pro is honored, and grateful, while hoping to make the world a better place. In 2023, a third party audit found Pro's accuracy for rumors and scoops to be 92.5%. SOCIAL MEDIA: X: http://x.com/wdwpro1 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@WDW_Pro EMAIL: wdwpro@thatparkplace.com
Join the Conversation
Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kevin

And we appreciate your honesty and integrity. Thank you all for producing some of the best published articles, regarding theme parks and entertainment news, on the net. Here for the long haul!

Valliant Renegade

Gee. Nobody saw that coming…

Kristina

That was fast! Glad to see the judicial system working so quickly.

Jake Tepper

This was dead on arrival. I only heard about it here so I must be doing something right.

Has anything moved on this:

In a statement issued to its bondholders last Thursday, Reedy Creek pointed out that the 1967 law also includes a pledge from Florida to its bondholders. The law states that Florida “will not in any way impair the rights or remedies of the holders … until all such bonds together with interest thereon, and all costs and expenses in connection with any act or proceeding by or on behalf of such holders, are fully met and discharged.”

TimQ

That’s a guarantee to the bond holders. It doesn’t say anything about how they will be paid back, but it’s likely it won’t be Florida residents in the nearby counties.

pucstpr39

Watch Valliant Renegade’s videos with Legal mindset on the topic. It is very clear that those bonds legally can only fall on property owners in Reedy Creek which happens to be Disney.