If Elsa Is a Lesbian and If Her Power Is a Metaphor for Her Sexuality, then Even the LGBTQIA+ Members Don’t Want the Inevitable Implication
Few things can unite childless purple-haired liberals and busybody church ladies, but in 2013 Disney did just that with Frozen. For little girls everywhere it was instantly rewatchable with an earworm showstopper that would go on to be sung at countless elementary school and summer camp talent shows. Elsa’s journey resonated with many, including lesbians, who for years have said they were not sufficiently represented; from repression by parents who feared her nature, through cathartic acceptance of herself, and into the discovery that true love is broader than she was ever told. Uptight church ladies were aghast to see that exact same thing being woven into a story designed to captivate their daughters.
“Let It Go”, in the tellings of both purple-hairs and busybodies, is Elsa’s coming-out song. It’s a powerful statement that she’ll no longer live by anyone else’s rules and be the slave to her own fears that she may hurt someone or that her powers will be known. Without that song and the inference that her magic is a proxy for homosexuality then Elsa is simply a character in a movie with no expressed sexual preference. If, on the other hand, Disney explicitly makes Elsa a lesbian, then the metaphor has to be more closely examined and very few people are going to like the implications.
Part of the problem is that “Let It Go” is in every way a traditional Disney villain song. It shares more with The Lion King’s “Be Prepared” than it does with the songs of other Disney heroes that came before. Superficially it is similar to first act songs by Ariel and Belle, but “Part of Your World” and the reprise of “Belle” are naïve answers to the internal call of adulthood. If there is another hero song like “Let It Go” then it’s “I Just Can’t Wait to Be King”, and that’s the song of a selfish child who will learn some very nasty lessons. The audience excuses the damage that Elsa does because she is unaware that she has devastated her kingdom, but she tells that same audience that she’s not going to look at her past anyway. This only makes sense if either Elsa was the villain until well into production or the movie makers are unmoored from traditional values. It could possibly be both.
Let’s take some steps back and look at that family dynamic which is so important to the thesis that Elsa is a lesbian. Like a heroine from the Disney Renaissance she doesn’t fit into her parents’ world. They make her hide an unacceptable part of herself. They don’t just make her hide her power, they hide her. In Dad’s conversation with the trolls we’re even told that she wasn’t cursed by these powers, she was born this way. No wonder the LGBT community seems to want to claim Elsa as their own. No wonder they want Disney to come out and say what they already know in their hearts.
But, why did Mom and Dad have to rush Anna to the trolls in the first place?
Before that happened Elsa didn’t seem to keep things a secret. We have no indication her parents were ashamed of her. Actually, it’s not until after the trolls that Mom and Dad decide to lock up the castle and hide her away from the world. Just that morning Elsa and Anna were playing together… alone… when Elsa’s power got out of control and touched her sister. That’s when Mom and Dad went for an outsider who tried to help Anna deal with what happened. That’s when the castle staff was dismissed and Elsa wasn’t allowed to play with her sister anymore.
Years later, after Elsa’s coronation when she is expected to host and attend a ball, what is the triggering event that brings out her magic for all to see?
Anna insists she’s going to be married. Elsa says, “No,” for reasons that are decidedly anachronistic and poor statecraft. Anna pushes back and makes it clear she wasn’t asking. That’s when Elsa’s magic can no longer be contained and the court sees her for what she really is. All because she can’t handle that her little sister wants to be married to a handsome prince.
Wait, that can’t be right. Disney is pushing a lot of things in the culture war, but they are not going to push THAT!
I don’t think they are intentionally doing it. Frozen is a disaster of poor writing with characterization that makes no sense, plot points that go nowhere or come from nowhere, and artifacts of other stories that had been discarded for decades. I think that up until the end they were making a Disney version of Wicked and wearing The Snow Queen as a mask, at nearly the last minute they changed directions and created all these problems for themselves.
I know that representation is important. I know that Disney is dedicated to making stories for the marginalized. I’m just begging them, don’t fight on this battlefield, there is no victory here.
For all the latest news and analysis of things that should be fun, keep reading That Park Place. As always, drop a comment down below and let us know your thoughts!



But is representation important? Especially for sexuality in a kid movie? I dare say it is not.
Disney is already in financial trouble… is “the message” important enough to have them segregate their cash cow audience?
“I know that representation is important.”
Well that depends. Passive representation — where you avoid racism and don’t purposely cast against a certain group even when the story wouldn’t suffer for it — is important, but active representation, aka woke diversity, is not.
Or rather, it’s important in the same way that cancer is important.
You should’ve seen this crazy hashtag on Twitter before Frozen 2 premieres! They keep give Elsa a girlfriend which is very stupid and very inappropriate!
Rewrite: You should’ve seen this crazy hashtag on Twitter before Frozen 2 premieres! They keep saying give Elsa a girlfriend which is very stupid and very inappropriate!
I can’t let this article slide.
Your article is as stupid as the scum that are pushing for Elsa to be a lesbian.
“But, why did Mom and Dad have to rush Anna to the trolls in the first place?”
BECAUSE ANNA WAS ALMOST KILLED, YOU STUPID IDIOT.
Elsa’s power didn’t just “get out of control and touch her sister.” It *knocked her out cold and almost killed her.*
The whole lesbian fight will be an issue with the third film that was just announced, but when you write such garbage analysis of events that happen in a film all it does is make YOU look like a hack who sucks at media literacy.
Yes, and if the magic is meant to be a metaphorical representation of Anna’s sexual inclinations, that takes the situation to some very dark places, which was the point of the article in the first place.
I’m pretty sure that wasn’t intended for several reasons, both because I think Elsa’s outbreak is more a general expression of contemporary “I will be myself; I will defy society; I will not serve!” than anything sexual, and because the film is too confused for anything more specific to be carried through a consistent metaphor.
But how do you REALLY feel?
I saw you delete my original post.
It really says a lot that you can’t handle criticism of a terribly written article.
And apparently this writer only joined TPP a few weeks ago, too.
Everything I said is valid and still stands.
ScaryHobbit, thanks for being a reader and commenter on TTP! I couldn’t find any deleted posts related to this article, but I want you to know that I’m going to take your comments which did survive and treasure them always. It’s readers like you, who contribute your time and feedback, that help to make writers better. I’ve thought a lot about your commentary and in the future I’ll try to make my writing more explicit. For instance, if I were to write about the near-death experience of an allergy sufferer I won’t say that, “Because he ate peanuts Mom stabbed him with an Epipen.” Instead I’ll make it clear that anaphylaxis caused mom to administer some exact amount of a specific medicine.