Paapa Essiedu wants to make his support for the Pride community clear. He is considerably less interested in discussing J.K. Rowling.
In Vanity Fair’s November 10 interview, HBO’s new Severus Snape declined to discuss the Harry Potter author’s politics while stating his own beliefs.
Snape in the Harry Potter television series – HBO Max
READ: Shanghai Disney Enchanted Star Hotel Reveals Wishing Star Design Ahead of Dec. 16 Opening
His remarks arrive after Essiedu signed an open letter opposing a U.K. Supreme Court ruling Rowling supported. Yet his latest statement about treating people with dignity does not, on its own, contradict what Rowling has publicly said about anyone’s rights.
Essiedu Declines to Discuss Rowling’s Politics
“I have been super clear about my position on this topic, and that is the reason why she spoke out about me,” Essiedu told the magazine. “I’m really keen not to make a kind of ‘them and us’ dynamic here. I’m not really here to speak about Jo’s politics or to be a mouthpiece for her. I can only be really, really clear about what I believe and be consistent with that.”
When the conversation turned to his own beliefs, Essiedu reiterated, “I don’t want to talk about Jo at all.”
He then offered a broader declaration of support.
“I believe, in my bones, that trans people, queer people, people of all creeds and color have got the right to be treated with respect and dignity and safety at all times—whether they’re in the workplace, whether they’re at home or in the street, whatever. That’s what I believe, and that’s the way that I choose to live my life. That’s the creed by which I live.”
The Open Letter and Rowling’s Response
Essiedu previously signed an open letter supporting the transgender, nonbinary, and intersex community and denouncing the U.K. Supreme Court’s April 2025 ruling on the meaning of sex under the Equality Act 2010.
The judgment held that “man,” “woman,” and “sex” refer to biological sex for the purposes of that legislation. The court also emphasized that transgender people retain protections against discrimination under the Act. Its ruling concerned the interpretation of a particular law, rather than a universal legal definition of womanhood.
Following criticism of Essiedu’s decision to sign the letter, Rowling addressed the prospect of his removal from the series.
I don’t have the power to sack an actor from the series and I wouldn’t exercise it if I did. I don’t believe in taking away people’s jobs or livelihoods because they hold legally protected beliefs that differ from mine. https://t.co/nKcAl3gcvO
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) May 5, 2025
“I don’t have the power to sack an actor from the series and I wouldn’t exercise it if I did,” Rowling wrote on X. “I don’t believe in taking away people’s jobs or livelihoods because they hold legally protected beliefs that differ from mine.”
Her response left room for a professional relationship despite their disagreement. Signing a letter opposing a ruling she welcomed would not, by her stated standard, justify costing Essiedu his job.
Where Their Statements Overlap
Rowling continues to advocate for women-only spaces and has described contemporary gender activism as “elitist to its core.”
However, as That Park Place previously reported in its coverage of her October essay, she also explicitly rejected discrimination and threats against transgender people.
J.K. Rowling via misshef YouTube
“Should trans people be discriminated against when it comes to housing or employment? Of course not. Should trans people be stripped of their human rights, or denied personal safety? Again: of course not.”
Essiedu’s statement about dignity and safety is compatible with those words. Their disagreement over the Supreme Court ruling remains, but his latest remarks do not explain where he draws the boundaries between competing claims involving sex, gender identity, and access to single-sex spaces.
That leaves less of a direct confrontation in this interview than the surrounding controversy might suggest.
Lithgow Has Taken a Different Approach
Essiedu’s reluctance to discuss Rowling also contrasts with John Lithgow’s repeated comments about the author.
John Lithgow sits for an interview – YouTube, GQ
READ: Disney World Discounted Rates Start at $99 a Night, But Guests Can’t Cancel or Change
The actor playing Dumbledore has said her views have been “twisted and misrepresented,” while also expressing disagreement with much of what she has said. He has discussed pressure to abandon the role and explained why he accepted it anyway.
For Essiedu, the preferred approach appears to be stating his principles without debating hers. That is his choice. But presenting support for transgender people’s safety as inherently opposed to Rowling’s stated position would overlook what she has actually written.
What do you think of Essiedu’s comments and his decision to avoid discussing Rowling’s politics? Sound off and let us know!
UP NEXT: Mike Baron Defies Cancel Culture With Veterans Day Launch of Private American II
