For years, Hollywood executives and legacy media companies treated YouTube creators, streamers, podcasters, and independent personalities as “new media” operating outside the real entertainment industry. But according to newly shared data from Samba TV measuring TV attention for YouTube and traditional Hollywood studios, that so-called “new media” ecosystem is now outperforming the largest entertainment conglomerates on Earth while spending dramatically less money doing it.
In a graphic shared on X, Samba TV compared major media companies based on annual content spending versus total share of TV viewing time. The results paint a brutal picture for traditional entertainment companies increasingly struggling to justify ballooning content budgets.
According to the chart, YouTube spends approximately $13 billion on content annually while commanding a staggering 13.1% share of TV time. That works out to roughly $1 billion spent for every 1% of TV attention.
Apple, meanwhile, spends approximately $7 billion while capturing just 0.4% of TV viewing time. Samba TV calculated that as an astonishing $20 billion spent per 1% of TV attention.
The contrast is difficult to ignore.
Apple spends $20B for every 1% of TV time.
YouTube does it for $1B.
Content volume isn’t the same as attention. The gap between spend and share tells the real story.#AttentionEconomy #TVData #Streaming #MediaStrategy #Samba pic.twitter.com/CZJZbCIlF0
— Samba TV (@samba_tv) May 13, 2026
Samba TV summarized the findings bluntly in its accompanying post:
“Apple spends $20B for every 1% of TV time. YouTube does it for $1B. Content volume isn’t the same as attention. The gap between spend and share tells the real story.”
Samba TV’s Data Raises Questions About Hollywood’s Spending Model
The graphic also compared other major entertainment companies.
Netflix reportedly spends around $17 billion annually and captures 8.7% of TV time, while Disney spends approximately $28 billion to secure 9.7% of TV viewing attention.
Warner Bros. Discovery, Paramount, Comcast, and Amazon’s Prime Video were also included in the analysis, with most traditional media companies landing between $2 billion and $5 billion spent per 1% of TV attention.
But YouTube stood alone at the top of the chart when it comes to TV attention.
That’s particularly significant because YouTube’s dominance is not driven by one centralized studio operation. Instead, the platform’s viewing share comes largely from a sprawling ecosystem of creators, livestreamers, gaming personalities, podcasts, commentary channels, reaction content, tutorials, independent entertainment, and algorithm-driven recommendations.
In other words, independent creators and audience-driven content are now competing directly with — and in many cases outperforming — billion-dollar entertainment conglomerates.
Disney’s Massive Entertainment Empire Still Trails YouTube
The comparison with Disney may be the most eye-opening part of the data.
Disney is not simply Disney+.
The logo for Disney+ – YouTube, Disney+
READ: Charlie Cox Says Original ‘Daredevil: Born Again’ Was Drifting Toward Ben Affleck’s Movie
The company’s entertainment footprint includes:
- ESPN
- Hulu
- ABC
- Marvel
- Star Wars
- Pixar
- National Geographic
- broadcast television
- cable television assets
- theatrical film releases
- live sports rights
Despite all of those combined assets operating under one corporate umbrella, Disney still trails YouTube in overall TV attention according to Samba TV’s chart.
That reality speaks to a much larger shift happening across entertainment.
(L-R): Osha Aniseya (Amandla Stenberg) and the Stranger in Lucasfilm’s THE ACOLYTE, season one, exclusively on Disney+. ©.
For decades, Hollywood studios and television networks controlled distribution. Audiences watched what studios approved, greenlit, marketed, and distributed through traditional gatekeepers.
YouTube fundamentally changed that equation.
Viewers now choose content directly from creators they trust, follow personalities independent of studios, and consume entertainment driven more by engagement and consistency than by massive production budgets.
Apple TV+ Continues to Face Questions About Cultural Reach
Apple’s placement on the chart also reinforces a criticism that has followed Apple TV+ since launch.
Apple has produced critically acclaimed programming like Pluribus and Ted Lasso while also investing heavily in prestige television projects with major stars and filmmakers, but the platform has often struggled to generate the kind of mass cultural attention seen by competitors.
Samba TV’s own numbers appear to reinforce that issue.
A screenshot from the trailer for The Savant – YouTube, Apple TV
The company’s estimated $20 billion spent per 1% of TV attention was by far the worst ratio on the chart.
Ironically, the same Samba TV account recently celebrated the Apple TV+ series Margo’s Got Money Troubles as a potential “sleeper hit” after reportedly averaging around 1 million viewers per episode across six episodes.
For many traditional studios, those numbers would hardly qualify as a breakout success relative to the scale of investment involved in modern streaming production.
YouTube’s Real Reach May Be Far Larger Than Samba TV’s Numbers Suggest
There is also an important caveat hidden within Samba TV’s data.
The chart appears to focus specifically on connected TV and smart TV viewing behavior rather than YouTube’s full ecosystem across mobile phones, tablets, desktops, laptops, gaming consoles, and embedded video across the internet.
That distinction matters enormously.
Gary Buechler via Nerdrotic YouTube
Unlike traditional streaming services such as Disney+, Netflix, Apple TV+, and Prime Video — which have mobile apps but are primarily consumed through television viewing — YouTube exists virtually everywhere.
The platform dominates:
- mobile viewing
- podcast consumption
- gaming livestreams
- short-form video
- educational content
- desktop viewing
- creator-driven live broadcasts
- reaction content
- tutorial culture
- and embedded web video across countless websites and apps
In other words, the 13.1% TV share reflected in Samba TV’s chart may only represent a fraction of YouTube’s total audience footprint.
If mobile devices, desktop viewing, and non-TV consumption were fully included, YouTube’s lead over traditional media companies could potentially be far larger than the chart already suggests.
Chris Gore via Nerdrotic YouTube
That reality further highlights how dramatically the entertainment landscape has shifted away from traditional Hollywood distribution models and toward creator-driven digital ecosystems.
The Creator Economy Is Replacing Hollywood’s Gatekeepers
The broader takeaway from Samba TV’s chart extends beyond streaming wars.
It highlights the growing power of the creator economy itself.
YouTube’s success isn’t built on a handful of billion-dollar tentpole productions. It’s built on endless content volume, direct audience relationships, low production overhead, livestream culture, gaming communities, podcasts, and creators who can react to trends in real time without navigating layers of corporate bureaucracy.
A screenshot of the YouTube logo – YouTube, Major Motions
Meanwhile, many legacy entertainment companies continue spending extraordinary sums chasing prestige television, franchise expansion, and cinematic universes while audience fragmentation grows more severe every year.
The result is a growing divide between spending and actual audience attention.
And according to Samba TV’s own numbers, YouTube currently appears to be winning that battle by a wide margin.
Are you surprised by the amount of TV attention garnered by YouTube? Sound off in the comments and let us know!
UP NEXT: Nintendo Moves ‘The Legend of Zelda’ Movie Release Date Up to April 2027
