The View co-host Sunny Hostin made headlines this week with an extraordinary revelation: she claimed she was the lone holdout juror who persuaded an entire jury to find the infamous “Butcher of Tompkins Square Park” not criminally responsible by reason of insanity.
There is just one major problem. Contemporaneous newspaper reports from 1991 tell a significantly different story.
The New York Post reports that multiple accounts published immediately following the Daniel Rakowitz trial identified the principal holdout as an unemployed man, while another report indicated there were actually two holdouts — directly contradicting Hostin’s claim that she alone stood against the other 11 jurors and eventually persuaded them “one by one.”
Even more damaging, Hostin’s own comments to reporters in 1991 appear difficult to reconcile with the version of events she presented on The View 35 years later.
Hostin Claims She Was ‘The Holdout Juror’
The controversy began when Hostin discussed the recent Lindsay Clancy trial and the role of holdout jurors.
Hostin told her fellow panelists that she had personal experience with exactly that situation.
Sunny Hostin brags about being a holdout juror that prevented The Butcher of Thompson Square Park from going to prison.
She admits “once he killed her, he chopped up her body parts, yes, boiled her body parts … and fed her body parts to the unhoused.” pic.twitter.com/sLbElgLuGt— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) September 22, 2026
“The reason I feel so strongly about this holdout juror is because I was a holdout juror in a case, in the Daniel Rakowitz case,” Hostin said, referring to the notorious 1991 case involving Rakowitz and his roommate, Monika Beerle.
Hostin then cited a contemporary New York Times report stating that several jurors said “one holdout juror was principally responsible for preventing them from returning a guilty verdict.”
“That was me,” Hostin declared. Then she went even further.
According to her telling, Hostin immediately recognized that Rakowitz was suffering from psychosis and remained steadfast despite furious resistance from the other jurors.
“It was so clear to me in the jury room,” Hostin said. “We were sequestered for nine days. One juror threw a chair at me. They were so angry with me.”
She claimed she gradually persuaded the entire panel.
“One by one, I picked them off,” Hostin said, before explaining that all 12 jurors eventually voted to find Rakowitz not criminally responsible by reason of insanity.
That’s an incredible story.
It also doesn’t match several accounts published when the trial actually happened.
1991 Reports Identified an Unemployed Man as the Holdout
A February 23, 1991 New York Daily News report identified the juror responsible for holding out for the insanity verdict as an unemployed man.
“One juror won a battle of wills by holding out for an insanity verdict,” the Daily News reported at the time, according to the resurfaced account.
Why is Sunny Hostin lying about being the hold out juror?
According to this article, Asunción “Sunny” Cummings Hostin is actually upset with the holdout juror, saying she believed the cannibal defendant was aware of his actions. She was upset w/the juror pushing for a NGBROI… pic.twitter.com/tzUFqkhhOQ— Jason “Storm Chaser” Nelson (@RealJasonNelson) September 24, 2026
Juror Valerie Holmes described that person as “very determined, very manipulative,” adding that he apparently didn’t mind extending deliberations.
An Associated Press report from the same period provided a similar account.
Jury forewoman Lois Markle said one person had been determined “from day one” that Rakowitz would be found not guilty by reason of mental disease. Holmes again identified that person as an unemployed man.
The New York Post also reports that a law enforcement source familiar with the case confirmed this week that the holdout was a man.
That would seemingly make Hostin’s declaration that she was the holdout impossible. But there’s an important wrinkle.
Another Report Says There Were TWO Holdouts
A contemporaneous Newsday report complicates the story considerably.
According to the February 23, 1991 article, 10 jurors initially wanted to convict Rakowitz while two jurors insisted he was mentally ill and should not be held criminally responsible.
Rather than produce a hung jury, the 10 ultimately deferred to those two holdouts.
Newsday specifically described one of those holdouts as the unemployed man referenced in the other reports. The second holdout was not identified.
Hostin now says she was that second juror.
Sunny Hostin issuing a legal notice on The View – YouTube, Page Six
When questioned by the New York Post following the resurfacing of the old reports, Hostin stood by her claim.
That means the available historical reporting does not establish that Hostin fabricated being a holdout altogether.
It does, however, create a serious problem for the much more specific story Hostin told millions of viewers on The View.
Hostin did not say she was one of two holdouts.
She specifically cited reporting about one holdout juror and declared, “That was me.”
She then claimed she persuaded the rest of the jury “one by one.”
The contemporary Newsday account instead describes 10 jurors eventually yielding to two holdouts. Those are materially different stories.
Hostin’s Own 1991 Comments Create an Even Bigger Problem
Then there are Hostin’s own words from 1991, which further complicate her story.
At the time, Hostin was 22-year-old paralegal Asunción Cummings. She was interviewed by multiple newspapers following the verdict.
And those comments sound remarkably different from her recollection today.
“We had to compromise,” Cummings told Newsday after the trial.
She then reportedly said Rakowitz “literally got away with murder” and “attempted to commit the perfect crime.”
Sunny Hostin speaking to JD Vance on The View – YouTube, The View
The New York Daily News quoted her making an even stronger statement about Rakowitz: “He knew what he was doing.”
That’s particularly striking because Hostin told The View this week that she “saw clearly that he was psychotic” and described herself as the juror steadfastly pushing for the insanity finding.
The New York Times also quoted Cummings following the 1991 trial saying the jury did not believe Rakowitz intended to kill Beerle but believed that, afterward, he dismembered her body while attempting to conceal what he had done.
Taken together, those comments create a much murkier picture than Hostin presented on television.
Someone saying “we had to compromise,” that Rakowitz “got away with murder,” and that “he knew what he was doing” doesn’t obviously sound like someone describing a verdict that she personally championed from the beginning.
What Actually Happened to Monika Beerle?
Lost amid the controversy surrounding Hostin’s story is the woman at the center of the case.
Monika Beerle was a 26-year-old dance student who shared an apartment with Rakowitz.
Rakowitz admitted to killing Beerle in 1989 and dismembering her body. Witness testimony and reports surrounding the case also included horrific claims about what Rakowitz subsequently did with Beerle’s remains.
Vice President JD Vance on The View – YouTube, The View
Following the 1991 trial, the jury found Rakowitz not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect.
He was subsequently committed to the Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center on Wards Island rather than sent to prison. Years later, a court determined that Rakowitz remained too mentally unstable to be released.
Hostin’s Version Simply Doesn’t Match the Historical Record
There’s enough contradictory reporting here that declaring Hostin was never a holdout would go further than the available evidence supports.
The Newsday report matters. If 10 jurors favored conviction while two favored the insanity finding, Hostin could indeed have been that unidentified second holdout.
But that does’ot resolve the discrepancies.
Hostin told The View that she was the holdout referenced by The New York Times. Contemporary accounts from the Daily News and Associated Press instead identify the principal holdout as an unemployed man.
Arnold Schwarzenegger on The View with Sunny Hostin – YouTube, The View
Hostin claimed she converted the other jurors “one by one.” Newsday reported that 10 jurors ultimately deferred to two holdouts.
And perhaps most significantly, Hostin told reporters in 1991 that “we had to compromise,” that Rakowitz “literally got away with murder,” and that “he knew what he was doing.”
Thirty-five years later, she described herself as having clearly understood from the beginning that Rakowitz was psychotic and as the driving force behind the insanity verdict.
Those two versions of the story are extremely difficult to square.
At minimum, the historical record now raises serious questions about how accurately Sunny Hostin portrayed her role in one of New York City’s most notorious criminal trials when she told the story this week on national television.
Do you think Sunny Hostin was telling the truth about being the holdout juror in this case? Sound off and let us know!
UP NEXT: Bob Iger Appears to Respond to Bob Chapek Allegations From Explosive Disney Memoir
