Rachel Maddow, MSNBC’s primetime star and the face of the network for more than a decade, has weighed in on the channel’s controversial rebrand to MS NOW. While much of the public response has mocked the new name as clunky and uninspired, Maddow insisted on her Monday broadcast that dropping the “NBC” will actually improve the network’s future.
Maddow Endorses the Change
Rachel Maddow told viewers that the MS NOW rebrand is an opportunity for the channel to stand on its own two feet, free from NBC’s influence.
“If there was ever a time for us to change our name, this is it,” Maddow said. “Because we’re not just separating from NBC News in corporate terms, we’re competing with them now.”
The Logo for MS NOW – Photo Courtesy of Versant
READ: Chaos on Royal Caribbean’s Icon of the Seas After Water Slide Glass Shatters
She framed the move as a declaration of independence rather than a corporate gimmick, arguing that MS NOW will have freedom to operate without being tethered to NBC’s editorial direction.
“In this case, we can apply our own instincts, our own queries, our own priorities, to getting stuff that we need from reporters and correspondents,” she claimed. “And so it’s gonna be better.”
At the same time, Maddow admitted that even she wasn’t entirely sure how to pronounce the new brand name.
“I have no idea how to pronounce MS NOW — or Versant either,” she quipped, before suggesting the shortened name was an “efficiency gain.”
Public Reaction Has Been Brutal
Despite Maddow’s optimism, critics online have had a field day. Social media users quickly branded MS NOW with mocking nicknames like “MS NOPE,” “Majorly Skewed News,” and “Most Surely No One Watching.” Branding experts have likewise warned that the change risks throwing away decades of hard-earned recognition associated with the MSNBC name.
Joy Reid on MSNBC – YouTube, SkyNews Australia
Still, Maddow’s vocal support signals that the network’s leadership and biggest star are unified in trying to sell the rebrand as a positive step forward.
Maddow’s Central Role at the Network
Maddow’s blessing carries unusual weight for a reason: she isn’t just another anchor. For years, her 9 p.m. hour was MSNBC’s crown jewel, regularly pulling the highest ratings on the network. Her success helped define MSNBC’s identity as a progressive counterweight to Fox News.
Yet in recent years, Maddow has dialed back her schedule. In 2022, she reduced her live hosting duties to just one night a week, devoting the rest of her time to special projects and long-form content. The move was part of a sweeping new contract with NBCUniversal reported to be worth around $30 million annually — making her one of the highest-paid personalities in television.
Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski during Morning Joe on MSNBC – YouTube, New York Post
That means Maddow remains the face of the network even when she’s not on the air every night. Her limited schedule reflects a reality where MSNBC is increasingly defined by her brand and her influence, rather than the channel as a whole.
Why Her Endorsement Matters
In the volatile world of media, Maddow’s endorsement of MS NOW is as important as any press release. With the network preparing to spin off under the new Versant umbrella, her approval provides a sense of perceived stability for viewers who may be skeptical about the changes.
For management, keeping Maddow happy has long been a priority — her reduced workload and massive paycheck are proof of her leverage. By backing the rebrand publicly, she’s signaling to colleagues and fans alike that the shift is intentional and part of a broader strategy, not just a corporate shake-up.
Joy Reid on MSNBC – YouTube, SkyNews Australia
That being said, many still aren’t buying it. While Maddow is still the most viewed personality on the network, the overall MSNBC ratings have been tanking. In such an environment being the highest viewed personality on a network no one is watching isn’t exactly something to brag about.
The Road Ahead
Whether viewers follow Maddow’s lead is another story. Her words may reassure MSNBC loyalists, but the mockery surrounding MS NOW suggests the network has a steep hill to climb in building credibility under its new identity. For now, Maddow has planted her flag: insisting that cutting NBC is not a setback, but a step toward independence.
Rachel Maddow speaks during her show on MSNBC – YouTube, MSNBC
The question is whether audiences will see it as “better” — or just another example of a legacy network throwing away a recognizable brand for something destined to be remembered more for the jokes than the journalism.
Do you believe Rachel Maddow about the MS NOW rebrand of MSNBC? Sound off in the comments and let us know!
We are in the era of many smart people being so damn stupid. Maddow is a great example of someone who could be considered smart compared to the mid-wits on the channel, like Scarborough and his hag wife Mika.
As for the channel, i don’t see how they are changing. They have the same staff they ever had, but now they don’t have to worry about actually being considered a legit news channel.
As with MSNBC the “News” part of their channel will be incidental to the Opinion part. Hell, they already got a court ruling saying that most of their hosts, even those with what should have nominally been “News’ were actually opinion.