Pedro Pascal has added his name to more than 2,000 Hollywood industry professionals opposing the proposed Paramount merger with Warner Bros. The open letter, published Monday in The New York Times, argues that if the deal is approved, “the integrity, independence, and diversity of our industry would be grievously compromised.”
In recent years, Pascal has been positioned as one of Hollywood’s biggest stars (in theory if not reality), with prominent roles across multiple major theatrical releases and television series in 2025. At the same time, he has remained a vocal advocate for a range of progressive political and social causes. This latest move is not an isolated gesture, but part of a broader, consistent pattern.
Pedro Pascal – Photo by Jesse Grant/Getty Images for Disney
READ: Disney Is Cracking Down on DVC For Non-Personal Use
Some critics are now questioning whether Pedro Pascal’s public activism ultimately benefits his career or the brands he represents.
A Pattern of Advocacy
In 2021, Gina Carano was fired from The Mandalorian following a social media post that compared hostility toward the political right to historical persecution. Disney and Lucasfilm described the post as “abhorrent and unacceptable.”
Cara Dune (Gina Carano) in Lucasfilm’s THE MANDALORIAN.
READ: Rock’N Rollercoaster Gets ‘Under New Management’ Storyline Courtesy of The Muppets
Three years later, Carano filed a lawsuit against her former employers. The suit argued that her co-star, Pedro Pascal, had also shared political content invoking parallels to 1930s and 1940s Germany on social media without facing similar consequences.
At the time of her firing, some fans pointed to what they saw as a double standard. While Pascal later deleted some of his more controversial posts, he has continued to speak out on political and social issues.
Profanity and Name Calling
Last year, while Pedro Pascal was frequently in the spotlight, he took nearly every opportunity to share his views publicly.
In May, while speaking to the international press at Cannes Film Festival, the actor addressed critics of his politics in explicitly profane terms. “F*** the people who try to make you scared,” he said. “Fear is the way that they win… keep expressing yourself and don’t let them win.” He was promoting his film Eddington, which some critics described as a direct attack on conservatives. The movie went on to flop at the box office, grossing just $13 million on a $25 million budget.
A screenshot of Pedro Pascal dancing around suggestively with a rainbow colored rod – X, @pascalarchive
READ: Viggo Mortensen Recast as Aragorn in ‘The Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum’
The following month, in an interview with Vanity Fair, Pascal criticized J.K. Rowling. His younger sibling has publicly identified with a gender identity different from birth sex, and he described Rowling’s advocacy for women-only spaces as “bullying.” He was responding to an earlier social media post in which he called her reaction to a U.K. Supreme Court ruling—affirming that legal definitions of “man” and “woman” under the Equality Act are based on biological sex—“heinous loser behavior.”
When Activism Meets Promotion
July saw Pedro Pascal once again engaging in gender-related political activism. At the Berlin premiere of Fantastic Four: First Steps, the Reed Richards actor said, “It’s important to protect people, especially those simply asking for the right to exist in bodies that belong to them and in the world that they never asked to be brought into.”
Pedro Pascal as Reed Richards in Fantastic Four: First Steps – YouTube, Marvel Entertainment
READ: Australian Police Investigating Katy Perry Over Ruby Rose Accusations
Unlike Eddington—an A24 art-house film designed to appeal to a niche audience—First Steps was intended to launch a new era of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Some commentators pointed out that, while Pascal is welcome to his opinions, when and where he shares them matters. This moment also reflects a growing overlap between entertainment and activism.
As his visibility grows off-screen, the distinction between actor and advocate becomes harder to separate.
The Stakes for a Franchise Star
This year, Pascal is set to appear in two major Disney releases. First, in May, he stars in The Mandalorian and Grogu, which carries notably modest box office expectations for a Star Wars entry. Then, in December, he is scheduled to reprise his role as Reed Richards in Avengers: Doomsday—possibly the most expensive movie ever made.
While his decision to sign the open letter opposing the Paramount–Warner Bros. merger is not an overtly political gesture, it has drawn significant attention. More importantly, it further cements Pascal’s reputation as an activist. The growing question for many observers is what effect that could have on his projects. Will audiences be swept up in the adventures his characters inhabit, or distracted by the man behind them?
Does Pedro Pascal’s political activism affect whether or not you will see his movies? Let us know in the comments!
UP NEXT: DOJ Takes Swing at NFL Antitrust Shield – Could This Finally Bring Back Free Games for Fans?
In the grand scheme of things: irrelevant opinion by an irrelevant actor, who never drew a dime.
But yeah, I will purposefully avoid pictures he stars in because I can’t stand him. So hey, maybe his opinions have a margin of relevancy after all.
He’s not irrelevant, he’s in Doomsday, and all bad publicity towards PP hurts that movie. He’s an achilles heel of it, and the Mandaboring & GooGoo movie. We should go online, and leave negative comments, scores and reviews.
It would be a shame if the woke were to learn Pascal hypocritically easts at Zionist restaurants with his Zionist Twink.
Hopefully this leads to fewer roles for him. I’m sick of Pascal’s ugly mug.
At this point, Paramount should go full-on right wing. Blacklist the list-suckers.
Then Paramount should sign beautiful people, unknown actors & actresses on exclusive contracts, and make them stars and starlets.
They should make movies not for the Modern Audience, but for heterosexual men. The chicks will watch what the men watch, like in yesterday, and can watch romantic movies made without mix-race relationships, you get my drift.
Honestly, if Paramount hired all the men not on that list, who are trustworthy, not woke. And gave them creative power, and hired writers of macho stories, where men are allowed to be men, role models kids can look up to, like yesteryear..
I mean, Paramount will quickly take over Hollywood, in the profits sense.
They have NOTHING TO LOSE! Do it!
Trump’s victory was achieved by bypassing the liar MSM. Likewise, Paramount should take note, boycott the Access Media, who will slag them off anyway, and boycott woke critics, ban them from early screenings. And they should trust word-of-mouth, saving a ton in marketing.
Notice how Avengers Doomsday actors are our enemies, all over again.
Guys, we must do all in our power to undermine this movie in every way we can. Grassroots hostility is powerful.
Good. Nothing would make me happier than to see Pascal’s activities get him blacklisted by Ellison as he’s making the new Naughty and Nice list for Paramount/WB.
But, seriously, they know this isn’t going to really be different than if the studio was acquired by Netflix. While Netflix is more openly an “ally” of the mentally ill, WB is still left-of-progressive politically.
In the meantime the article doesn’t mention any of the other blemishes on Pedo. Nothing about his double standard of yelling about “Free Palestine” then playing hide the sausage with a male Israeli?
This is another line that makes me question if this site is lobbying to be rolled up into HuffPo:
“His younger sibling has publicly identified with a gender identity different from birth sex,”
No, his “younger sibling” doesn’t identify with a “different gender identity” his BROTHER LUCAS (not “sister” “Lux”) suffers from a serious mental illness, which remains untreated thanks to treatment avoidance and heavy support (financial, I’m sure, as well as emotional) by big bro(?) Pedo.
Hear hear 👍